Smoke Free Alberta

Yay! Alberta is going smoke free (somewhat) on January 1st, 2006.

The following is a list of places that must be smoke-free if minors are permitted to enter:

  • Restaurants, banquet halls and entertainment facilities
  • Healthcare facilities
  • Public and private schools and school property
  • Common areas in residential buildings (hotels, motels, apartment and condominium buildings)
  • All offices and government buildings
  • Work vehicles
  • All enclosed public places including parking garages
  • Day nurseries
  • Reserved seating in sporting arenas or entertainment venues

Smoke Free Alberta

Alberta’s Debt is Paid Off

Ralph Klein was pleased to announce yesterday that the provincial debt in Alberta has finally been paid off. When questioned about where he got the money Klein apparently responded, “I finally got around to returning my empties.”

Election Questions For Local Lethbridge MP Candidates

Things are turning political in Canada.

While perusing a Boing Boing article this morning I decided to imitate an idea I found there. An astute Canadian has written the MP candidates within his constituency asking four simple questions.

I followed suit and emailed the Lethbridge constituents. Here are their responses, edited only to fit in with each other on this posting. The text has not been changed.

Reply Legend (in alphabetical order):

BlueRick Casson (Conservative Party of Canada)
*GreenErin Matthews (Green Party of Canada)
*RedKen Nicol (Liberal Party of Canada)
OrangeMelanee Thomas (NDP of Canada)

*-indicates the candidate has not yet responded.

1) There has been a lot of talk of a Canadian version of the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) Would you support this? and why?

Rick Casson: Currently we are researching with Conservative national office your inquiry regarding the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Melanee Thomas: I would not support a Canadian version of the DMCA because many Canadians are personally and legally using music and other mediums on-line with intent to not infringe copyrights. I think that laws like the DMCA violate freedoms of expression and that there are better ways to balance copyrights and expression in law.

1b) Do you support changes at all to our existing copyright laws?

Melanee Thomas: I do not support anything specific at this time. I would have to do more research on this subject. If you have any feedback or ideas on this topic, I would be interested in hearing what you have to say.

2) Mr. Martin says he supports the change to allow same sex marriage, while Mr. Harper says he would put it to a free vote – How would you vote?

Rick Casson: I believe marriage is the union between one man and one woman.

Melanee Thomas: I would vote in favour of equal marriage. Sexual orientation is a “personal immutable characteristic” and is inalienable from a person, therefore, we need to write laws that protect them, not unlike how we have law to protect people based on their religious beliefs or gender or race.

3) Do you support the Kyoto accord? why?

Rick Casson: Koyoto Accord is Not a made in Canada solution. We will become an environmental world leader by focusing on clean air, clean water, clean land, and clean energy Canadians know we are fortunate to live in the most beautiful country in the world, a country with the world’s largest fresh water supply and abundant natural resources and wildlife species. But we also know we cannot take this natural environment for granted. We must be responsible stewards of our land, water, and air.

We need results, not just talk Paul Martin and the Liberal government have long talked a good game on the environment, but delivered little. While he was in office, Paul Martin’s own shipping company, Canada Steamship Lines, was charged with polluting Halifax Harbour. As the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development has demonstrated, Canada faces “an environmental and sustainable development deficit” caused in part by the “gap between the commitments the federal government has made and the results it has achieved.” Canadians must demand better stewardship for their environment. They must demand a government that will be less interested in flashy announcements at international conferences, and more interested in environmental results.

A Conservative government will work with Canadians to address real environmental problems and develop a longterm vision for a healthy, sustainable environment as a trust for future generations.

The Plan
A Conservative government will implement the commitments of Stephen Harper’s February 2004 paper, “Towards a Cleaner Canada,” including:

  • Legislate caps on smog causing pollutants like Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Negotiate power plant and smokestack emissions limits with the United States and border states. Investigate a cap-and-trade system that will allow firms to generate credits by reducing smog-causing pollutants.
  • Increase fines for first occurrences of ocean spills to $500,000 plus clean-up costs. Pass legislation providing that ships and their cargo can be seized and impounded until fines are paid. Extend funding for radar satellite surveillance on the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts.
  • Initiate an audit of federal contaminated waste sites to determine potential health risks and clean-up costs. Support spending $4 billion over ten years to clean up contaminated sites such as the Sydney tar ponds.
  • Allow businesses to deduct costs of brownfield remediation expenses, and take further measures recommended by the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy to reduce the risks to the private sector of brownfield development.
  • Work with the provinces to develop a national strategy for alternative energy and energy conservation, including increasing the use of renewable energy sources, research and development into alternative energy and energy efficiency technology, and a long term study of Canada’s energy situation that considers the relative cost of energy sources, energy security, trade relations, and environmental conservation.
  • Redirect federal spending aimed at fulfilling the terms of the increasingly irrelevant Kyoto Protocol to concrete programs to ensure clean air, water, and land, and to promote energy conservation.

Melanee Thomas: I support the Kyoto accord for several reasons. First, I enjoy hiking in Waterton Lakes National Park (which is in the Lethbridge constituency), but I do NOT enjoy looking out over the prairie vista from a mountain top and seeing smog. Air tests have indicated that particles and pollution from China have blown across the jet stream to settle in our area. This indicates to me that we need a global solution to pollution and climate change. My generation is being left with an environmental debt that I don’t know how we’re going to pay off.

One other reason why I support Kyoto is the result of the activities of two petrochemical corporations: Suncor and Beyond Petroleum. Both companies have implemented their Kyoto commitments, and both companies are MAKING MONEY. This is evidence that making our business environmentally sustainable and making our buildings, etc environmentally friendly creates jobs and boosts the economy.

4) This is the most important question, how will you make sure that your voice is the voice of Lethbridge while you are MP?

Rick Casson: The most important issue(s) for an MP to address are the ones which interest, impact or are of greatest importance to his constituents. By being connected to his constituents through personal contact, or telephone and e-mail communications a wide-range of diverse, often complex issues are brought forward. Since being elected Lethbridge Member of Parliament in 2000 I have attended in excess of 500 functions also attended by thousands of constituents. During each event opinions, ideas and general thoughts are shared on national and regional topics, yet in all cases the bearing an issue has on a local level is of greatest significance.

Melanee Thomas: I will actively seek out the positions and opinions of all constituents, including those who are not traditionally NDP supporters. Lethbridge very clearly has a plurality of opinions, so it is important to be open about my own moral code and worldview so that constituents know where I am coming from as well. I have already committed to quarterly meetings with several important community groups if elected, which will help keep me in touch with the community as well. Above all, I plan to continue with canvassing and door knocking because I’ve found that people are most open and honest and upfront when asked what is important to them. That kind of feedback needs to be sought out, and I am more than prepared to make that a central part of my job as MP.

The Film that Disney Blocked

Lion’s Gate is going to distribute Michael Moore’s controversial new film “Fahrenheit 9/11”.

The distributors plan to start showing the movie in U.S. theatres on June 25, with pay television rights to be handled by Showtime, a partner of Lion’s Gate, AFP said.

The film, which won the Cannes Film Festival’s Palme D’Or last month, criticizes President George W. Bush’s response to terrorism and also highlights ties between the Bush family and Saudi oil families.

Update: Fahrenheit 9/11’s trailer is now online. Also check out reviews from IMDB. Apparently you don’t need to actually have seen the movie to say whether or not you liked it.

Vanunu out of Prison But Definitely Not Free

Mordechai Vanunu was released from prison earlier today, but will have to live under some very restraining rules. The leader of the Israeli Opposition Party and founder of Israel’s nuclear weapons program Shimon Peres says the heavy restrictions imposed upon Vanunu are justified.

As I mentioned in an earlier post Mordechai Vanunu betrayed his country, Israel, by telling the world about its atomic weapons program. Vanunu is not allowed to speak with the media, he is not allowed to release any information about Israel’s weapon’s programs including information that has already been leaked. He must give 24 hours notice if he wishes to sleep at a different address and he is not allowed to communicate in Internet chatrooms unless specific permission is given. He is not allowed to speak to “foreigners”, he has no Israeli passport and Israel’s intention is to keep him within their borders preventing him from speaking to anyone about their secrets. Other restrictions will be applied if the government feels he is not cooperating.

Israeli Traitor Mordechai Vanunu after being released from 18 years of prisonAfter 18 years of prison, nearly 12 of which were in solitary confinement, I hope he’s learned that the government means business. It’s in his own best interest to go along with the rules that have been setup for him, and just try to start living his life. Given the picture of him here, flashing victory signs, I think he has other plans in mind.

Supporters of Vanunu have put up a special website on his behalf. Meanwhile news organizations like The Moscow Times, Jerusalem Post, and many more are running stories about his release and speculating on what he might do next.

A Special Sense of Humour

A label that says: Nous sommes desoles que notre president soit un idiot. Nous n'avons pas vote pour lui

Cbrown posted this little gem via their blog, and I thought it worth mentioning.

I had to share this find. I recently purchased a high-quality computer sleeve from a small boutique manufacturer. I was checking if it could be washed. The photo is the attached tag with the washing instructions in both English and French. The English is exactly what you would expect and so is the French, for the first 6 lines. The last three lines of French are most interesting. “We are sorry that our President is an idiot. We didn’t vote for him.”

Update: Salon has an article about the french labels.

Flashmobs with a purpose

Xeni Jardin posts via BoingBoing about the impromptu protests in Spain yesterday, where thousands gathered in the streets demanding answers from their government about this week’s deadly terrorist attacks in Madrid. Bloggers in Spain tell BoingBoing the gatherings were decentralized flash mobs, organized primarily by short text messages sent via weblog forums, online in chatrooms and through Internet-capable mobile devices.

“Around 6PM local time in Madrid, an estimated 3,000-5,000 protesters gathered spontaneously in front of the headquarters of Spain’s ruling Popular Party (Partido Popular, or PP), located on calle Genova. Participants shouted slogans against media manipulation, and carried signs asking, “Who did it?”. Flashmobs spread by SMS throughout the country, with parallel gatherings quickly emerging in other cities.

The protests occurred one day before general elections take place in Spain. Government representatives denounced today’s gatherings, describing them as illegal assemblies — but because they were organized in a decentralized manner using mobile technology, there was no single responsible party against whom punitive action could be taken.”

Also of interest, from the same site, is the fact that “the events of 9/11 and 3/11 share a number of unsettling connections: the Madrid attacks took place exactly two and a half years after those in NYC, and there were precisely 911 days between the two.” Strange coincidence? Maybe, but growing evidence suggests not.

My Opinions on the Candidates for The University of Lethbridge’s 2004/2005 Students’ Union Elections

Today and tomorrow are the Student Union Elections. I had no idea who to vote for, so I’ve been reading up on the candidates trying to make an informed decision. Tyler Tanner, Jon Morrison, Scott McIntyre, Loralee Edwards, and Paul Daniels are running for President; Matthew Sletto, Jason Rumer, and Gorm Hansen for VP Academic. Kelly Andres and Greg Imeson are running for VP Administration while Clay Campbell, Michael Smith, and Patricia Butt are running for VP Internal Affairs. My review of their profiles (as found in the student run newspaper The Meliorist.)

Running for President:
Tyler Tanner—From Taber, Alberta. One of the infamous Tanner crew, specifically of the “Mother Tanner’s Sweet Taber Corn” line. Personally I would have left that detail out. He says some good things about the University and then toots his horn about what a great guy he is, but says little about why he would make a good president.

Jon Morrison—Management student. His reason for running is a personal interest in student issues. He fails to cite which issues he’s interested in. He has little or no experience in politics. Also he didn’t proof read his profile before submitting it, “I have developed a interest in student issues”¦” Do I really want someone so grammatically inept as my SU president?

Scott McIntyre—Unfortunately Scott has dropped out of the race. PoliSci student and likely would have been my first pick. Rumor has it he is not running for personal reasons.

Paul Daniels—The incumbent. His platform was based on what he has done and what he is going to do. So far so good, but his main points were that he has started to make the Zoo (the campus pub) a more welcoming environment, reviving Thursday night action there as well making the place non-smoking. He also added that ratified clubs need better funding and benefits. So if he’s elected I suppose I should assume that more of my SU fees will be going to University Clubs. Maybe I would care if I was in one.

Loralee Edwards—A senior student, and given the choices probably the best choice, but I still haven’t decided for sure.

Running for Vice President Academic:
Matthew Sletto—No bio submitted. I guess I know who I won’t be voting for.

Jason Rumer—Jason has a lot of experience in the SU and other political organizations. His bio focused on past experience rather than plans for the future but his list of past experience was impressive.

Gorm Hansen—Gorm also has had a lot of previous experience. His bio was unfortunately quite short. He does, however, have something going for him (at least as far as my vote goes) in that someone I recently met from the SU, whom is graduating, said that if he were to pick, either Jason or Gorm would be good choices but that personally he would vote for Gorm.

Running for Vice President Administration:
Kelly Andres—Long bio and considering the opposition, she’s my pick.

Greg Imeson—Why the hell would you run in a student union election and not submit a bio to the University’s student newspaper? I guess we could ask Greg that question.

Running for Vice President Internal Affairs:

Clay Campbell—Currently Clay is the Vice President of University Hall, for the Organization of Residence Students. He is also the founder and two-year president of GALSO (more commonly known as GALIA). He goes on to say that University Clubs are very important [yadda yadda] and that if elected he will divert more funds to clubs. Seeing as he’s the president of one of the clubs I’d have to say his bias on this topic shows through pretty clearly.

Michael Smith—I don’t want to seem judgmental here, but when he listed one of his hobbies as pilates, I had to wonder exactly what type of guy mentions his hobby of a specific kind of exercise when campaigning in Student Union elections. I guess we could ask Mike that. Anyway he’s currently the Vice President of GALIA and a treasurer of the board of directors at CKUL (the University’s radio station). His platform revolves around his desire to encourage diversity. Hmmm.

Patricia Butt—Ok, my last hope Patricia Butt (also known as Tricia). I was actually put off of the idea of voting for Patricia due to the over usage of bad puns in her political advertisements around the school. Puns aside, reading her bio seemed like what I imagine the cover letter of an application to be a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader would be like. Don’t get me wrong it was actually a pretty well written piece, but it didn’t seem to fit with someone concerned about Internal Affairs. I couldn’t help but think that if she were handwriting this, she would have dotted her lower case “i’s” and “j’s” with little smiley faces. She sounds pretty sporty and had a nice picture to boot, but her platform revolved around what a fun person she is and her love of all things sporty and cute. In the end though, I’ll probably end up voting for her.

The other positions didn’t have enough interest so all running for those positions will be awarded victory by acclamation.

The Man Who Knew (and then told) Too Much

Mordechai Vanunu is a political prisoner in Israel. He went to prison in 1986 for revealing to the world the existence and extent of Israel’s nuclear program. After spending almost two decades in high security lockup, Vanunu is slated to be released next month. He is already talking about the details of his alleged abduction by Mossad while in Europe — and Israeli authorities are not pleased.

I must admit I really have mixed feelings about this. The thing is, a lot of things have changed since 1986 — it doesn’t seem like knowledge of Israel’s Weapons of Mass Destruction are anything to worry about these days. But at the same time Vanunu breached their national security when he “spilled the beans” about the atomic weapons, and it sounds like he is a continual thorn in the governments side. Hard to prove that the Israeli government is fully justified though. He does paint them in a pretty bleak picture, even if he has a lot of reasons to vilify them.

They’re Calling It, "The Mother of All Canadian Political Scandals"

Yesterday’s Auditor Generals report revealed a situation in Ottawa so serious and shocking as to be without precedence in our country’s history. All other previous scandals (yes, we’ve had lots of them) pale by comparison.

http://www.thestar.ca/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1076411365455&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154

Feb. 10, 2004. 08:41 PM

‘Shocking‘ misuse of public funds
Martin launches public inquiry

CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA (CP) – The quarter-billion-dollar federal sponsorship fiasco was so widespread that even Canada‘s fabled national police force was used to funnel cash to friends of the federal government, Auditor General Sheila Fraser said today.

Fraser delivered a brutally methodical account of how the Public Works Department used Crown corporations and the RCMP to systematically shovel funds from a national-unity program to a select group of businesses.

The indictment claimed its first casualty before it was even made public. Former public works minister Alfonso Gagliano was summarily fired from his job as ambassador to Denmark by Prime Minister Paul Martin.

Gagliano‘s department ran a now-infamous sponsorship and advertising program that saw organizers of Quebec public events paid huge sums to display Canadian flags or federal logos from 1997 to 2003.

But more than $100 million – or 40 per cent of the $250 million fund – ended up in the pockets of middlemen who sometimes did nothing more than just turn over cheques, Fraser charged.

The list of mysterious transactions, enigmatic banking and blatant fraud was detailed in detached but devastating prose in her report.

Crown corporations like VIA Rail, Canada Post, and the Port of Montreal were also fingered in a report that has potentially explosive consequences ahead of an expected spring election.

“This is just such a blatant misuse of public funds. It is shocking. . . . Words escape me,” Fraser told a news conference.

“This wasn‘t just a matter of missing documentation or bending the rules. These methods were apparently designed to pay commissions to communications agencies while hiding the source of the funds.”

Each glance at her own report stirred her to outrage, Fraser said. She called for an independent inquiry into the affair.

The government immediately agreed to hold an investigation.

Justice John Gomery of the Quebec Superior Court will lead the public inquiry. Another jurist, Andre Gauthier, was named special counsel for financial recovery. Gauthier‘s job will be to launch civil suits to recover some of the squandered money.

The government has had several months to prepare its response to what turns out to be a ticking political time bomb tossed into Martin‘s lap by his predecessor, Jean Chrétien.

Fraser‘s report was supposed to be made public last November, but Chrétien prorogued Parliament which delayed the auditor general‘s indictment until he was out of office.

But Martin‘s field generals and his entire cabinet have been seized by the need to dull the sting of a blow that could ground the prime minister‘s lofty public approval ratings.

Several senior members of the government were at a meeting at 8 a.m. today. Aides could be seen lugging bulky briefing material into the Langevin building housing the prime minister‘s office.

One senior government official promised to follow the investigation wherever it might lead – even if it hurts the Liberal party.

“We‘re not interested in a witch hunt and we‘re not interested in anything that could negatively affect the party brand,” said the official.

“But at the end of the day the public interest demands that the answers to these questions be provided.

“We‘re the government. We‘re not just a political party.”

Martin immediately called the report‘s findings “intolerable” and announcing several steps to contain the damage.

“Canadians deserve better and we will deal with the findings of the auditor general‘s report in all of its facets and we will do so immediately and we will do so thoroughly,” Martin said.

He said the government will take four steps:

  1. An independent public inquiry to probe the scandal.
  2. An immediate review of the auditor‘s report by the House of Commons public accounts committee.
  3. Appoint a special counsel to recover public funds which were inappropriately attained.
  4. Introduce other measures to ensure the problems never occur again, including whistleblower protection and better management practices.

Opposition critics swiftly pounced at the scent of government blood. Their primary question: Why didn‘t Martin take action when he was finance minister in Chrétien‘s cabinet alongside Gagliano?

“Why did the prime minister stay silent when long ago he could have just said, `Stop it, this isn‘t right,” Grant Hill, the interim Conservative leader, asked in the Commons.

“The prime minister knew about the scandal and yet he said nothing and he did nothing. Why did he choose to be silent instead of speaking up?”

Martin responded that he was unaware of any wrongdoing and approved funding for the sponsorship program on the assumption that rules were being followed.

But several opposition critics predicted that closer examination of the money trail will further embarrass the prime minister and damage the reputation of the governing party.

“This was not a government operation,” NDP MP Bill Blaikie said of the sponsorship program. “This was a Liberal party operation.”

When allegations of mismanagement first surfaced two years ago, the RCMP was called in to launch a criminal investigation that has since resulted in charges against Montreal businessman Paul Coffin.

Calling in the Mounties to investigate this time will be impossible, said Conservative MP John Williams.

“They (the RCMP) have to explain why they have become involved in a money-laundering scheme. This is our national police force,” he said.

“This is a scandal of the greatest magnitude.”

The RCMP‘s 125th anniversary in 1999 turned into an embarrassing waste of taxpayer dollars, Fraser said.

Public Works contributed $3 million to a trio of ad agencies – Lafleur, Media/I.D.A. Vision and Gosselin – who were responsible for transferring the money to the RCMP.

Those three agencies took a combined $1.3 million in fees and commissions and transferred $1.7 million to the RCMP for its anniversary celebration.

Fraser‘s audit concluded that the RCMP‘s Quebec division received its payments through a separate non-government bank account, which violates the federal Financial Administration Act.

The transactions were recorded manually rather than in the RCMP‘s standard accounting system, and some of the supporting documents were subsequently destroyed.

Fraser outlined similar practices in a stamp competition organized by Canada Post; in a Via Rail-sponsored television series on hockey legend Maurice Richard; and in a project to raise $1.5 million for a giant screen TV for the federally run Port of Montreal.

The auditor general expressed two major concerns with the practice.

First, there was obviously no need to go through private middlemen to transfer cheques from a government department to a government agency or crown corporation.

And it was useless to pay federal agencies like the RCMP to display the federal logo at their events. Treasury Board guidelines required them to do it, with or without the sponsorship program, Fraser noted.

The Chrétien government created the now-infamous program as a response to the near-catastrophe of the 1995 Quebec referendum.

Federal funds were used to fund sports and cultural events – almost always in Quebec – while event organizers plastered Canadian flags and federal posters for visitors to see.

But the government used the fund to confer lavish commissions on a small group of ad agencies that acted as middlemen.

Fraser had already denounced the practice in a narrower 2002 probe that focused on $1.6 million transferred to Groupaction Marketing Inc.

She concluded at the time that the federal government broke “just about every rule in the book” in awarding contracts to the Montreal agency.

Groupaction said today it has voluntarily collaborated during each step of the audit.

But the Quebec company said it has been a victim of the situation, which caused the loss of about 100 jobs.

“It‘s important to underline that all of the work received by Groupaction were for contracts duly issued,” the company said in a news release. “That said, the absence, not to mention the apparent disappearance, of government documents has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to Groupaction.”

Fraser‘s report released today also blasted the government in other areas. Fraser also concluded that:

The Chrétien government ignored federal contracting policies in rushing to spend $101 million on two Bombardier jets for the prime minister and other VIPs.

Indian and Northern Affairs has failed to track spending or resolve disputes linked to native land claims worth more than $1.2 billion.

Her probe into the sponsorship fiasco highlighted a number of other irregularities.

Among them was the story of a communications firm that received a $600 commission from a $5,600 grant to a Quebec college.

All the government received in return was the MP‘s name added to a mural at the college.

She also explained how the Montreal Impact soccer team received almost $150,000 in sponsorship funds during the 1998-99 indoor season.

A similar request by the Edmonton Drillers soccer team was rejected, with the government claiming no funds were available.