Jeff Milner

The petitioner to recall Nathan Neudorf is Ryan Tanner. I’ve never met him but I’ve heard he’s an elders’ quorum president at the church I used to go to.

As such, one might expect him to be a truthful sort of fellow. That doesn’t appear to be the case.

Here is a copy¹ of his reasons for requesting Nathan Neudorf be recalled:

An acquaintance of mine iMessaged Ryan to see if he was the same Ryan Tanner behind the recall. He confirmed that he was and when she let him know that we had also been organizing to recall Neudorf and would he like to meet with us on zoom, he didn’t respond, left her message as “read”, and then blocked her.²

Very concerning and frankly appears dishonest.

I received the following email from someone³ residing in Lethbridge-East:

I sent an email to recallneudorf@gmail.com and on Friday afternoon I received an email from Ryan Tanner stating that they were in the process of getting organized and that they would be in touch shortly to let me know how I could help.

Yesterday morning (Monday, Dec 1st), I received a second email stating that there would be a meeting for the volunteers to have us sign the forms in order to get our canvasser badges and packages. We were given the name Mike as a contact for that meeting and the meeting was today (Dec 2nd) at 8am at Tim Hortons in South Lethbridge. I was there early and right at 8am Mike shows up. A few minutes later, another woman […] came and it was just the three of us. No one else! And I know there are MANY people wanting to get involved, so this was the first suspicious thing to me. [The other woman] had some concerns about the whole thing and wasn’t willing to sign the application form until she met Ryan Tanner – who never actually came to this meeting. She was upset about this and quickly left. I then asked Mike if he had met Ryan and he said no, he didn’t know who Ryan was. And Mike didn’t even understand the recall process at all, so I explained what I knew about it to him. This was also very suspicious to me as you would think that someone volunteering to get involved would have a basic understanding of things. Then I asked him why he was involved and who asked him to come give us the forms to sign seeing has he’d never met Ryan, and he mentioned that he got a call from Sariah Seaborn of Nathan Neudorf’s office to come to this meeting to hand out papers. This completely shocked me! He then mentioned that he lived on the West Side of the city and isn’t even part of our riding.

I am 100% convinced now that there is something nefarious going on here and this recall is very likely being stalled by Nathan Neudorf’s own office members!

I understand there is someone by the name of Cheryl Seaborn who works in Nathan Neudorf’s office. I’m told she has a daughter named Sariah Seaborn. It’s awfully hard not to assume it’s the same Sariah Seaborn.

Elections Alberta called me back today about my concerns reaching Ryan via email if he was just sending back form letters but not working on actually trying to get signatures for his recall petition. She was trying to be helpful but ultimately I was left with few options besides using the contact information that was on his application and hoping he will open up communications.

Here is the Lethbridge Herald’s article on the story: Stalled Recall.

1. Recall applicant statement (Notice of Recall Petition) [↩]
2. I actually can’t confirm she was blocked, just that she was no longer getting read receipts with further messages.[↩]
3. I’m not sure they want their identity disclosed so I’m keeping them anonymous[↩]

A friend’s wife recently met with the MLA for Lethbridge East, the so-called honourable Nathan Neudorf. Here are the notes she shared on Facebook about the meeting:

Reflections from my recent Meeting with Nathan Neudorf

On November 10, I sat down with MLA Nathan Neudorf to discuss my concerns about Public Education and his vote in favour of legislating teachers back to work using the Notwithstanding Clause.

I’ll be honest—I wasn’t sure how the meeting would go. But I was grateful for the chance to speak directly with him.

During the meeting, I shared many concerns (which I will list below), but the main concern regarded the use of the Notwithstanding Clause.

Nathan’s explanation: He told me he wasn’t personally in favour of the clause, but said that “due to the Democratic Process” he had to vote yes with his party. When I pressed him, he admitted that if he voted against, he would be removed from the UCP.

My response: That’s not the Democratic Process—that’s Party Policy/Solidarity. Democracy means representing the people who not only elected you, but who are in your constituency, not simply following party orders. If Neudorf had stood up for what was right, he could have remained as an independent MLA and kept his integrity intact.

As someone who teaches about democracy and Canada’s government systems, I find it deeply troubling when elected officials confuse party loyalty with democratic responsibility.

A Quick Refresher on Democracy (for anyone who needs it. Maybe some MLA’s out there?):

• Democracy = power of the people (Greek “demos” + “kratia”).
-which Nicolaides should be aware of. Just saying.

• In Canada, we use representative democracy: citizens elect MLAs to represent them, not their party bosses.

True democratic participation includes:

• Voting
• Paying taxes & jury duty
• Petitioning & protesting
• Staying informed

The Charter of Rights protects our right to protest, freedom of expression, and peaceful assembly—unless a government invokes the Notwithstanding Clause to override those rights.

Why this matters: Democracy only works if citizens are informed and engaged. Without proper funding for Public Education, we risk raising generations of voters who don’t understand their rights—or how easily those rights can be taken away.

Democracy isn’t perfect, but it gives us the power to demand change. That power is lost when elected officials put party loyalty above the people they represent.

My takeaway: I want MLAs who understand democracy, have the courage to stand up for what’s right, and who put integrity above party politics. Albertans deserve nothing less.

The Gist of My Concerns Raised with MLA Nathan Neudorf

• Government tried to strip away teachers’ pensions.
• Removed ATA’s disciplinary measures that were working.
• Rolled out a flawed curriculum with zero resources—teachers left to buy/create their own.
• Cut PUF funding for children with severe needs in public schools, but kept it for private schools.
• Changed funding models so schools aren’t funded based on actual students in classrooms.
• Forced mandatory assessments (Bill 6)
  • For Kindergarten–Grade 5:
  • Not designed by experts
  • No diagnosis or supports provided
  • 30–90 minutes per child, no funding for subs
  • Kindergarten assessments required, even though KG isn’t mandatory
• Used the Notwithstanding Clause to legislate teachers back instead of bargaining in good faith.
• Undermining teachers by lowering education requirements, risking quality and salaries.
• Ignored class sizes and complexity until now, after excluding them from negotiations.
• Alberta = highest funding for private schools + lowest funding for public schools in Canada.

Bottom line: Alberta’s government is undermining teachers, underfunding public schools, and misrepresenting democracy. OUR KIDS DESERVE BETTER!

I tried to get a meeting with Nathan Neudorf myself but was told he was too booked up to meet at this time.