Exxon Valdez 20 Years Later

dead whale from Exxon Valdez oil spill

Last Tuesday marked the twenty-year anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil disaster that polluted 2000km (1200 miles) of Alaskan coastline.

Most people assume that Exxon followed through with the many promises to clean it up and pay out proper restitution to those who were damaged by the accident. Investigative reporter Greg Palast says those assumptions are wrong.

Twenty years later, the oil is still lingering in the environment, Exxon has whittled down its court ordered fees by billions, it’s rigged the system to actually collect some of that money back, and to top it all off, many rightful claimants are dead.

Two years after the spill, Otto Harrison, General Manager of Exxon USA, told Evanoff and me to forget about a fishing boat for Uncle Paul. Exxon was immortal and Natives were not. The company would litigate for 20 years.

They did. Only now, two decades on, Exxon has finally begun its payout of the court award — but only ten cents on the dollar. And Uncle Paul’s boat? No matter. Paul’s dead. So are a third of the fishermen owed the money.

The Untold Story of the World’s Biggest Diamond Heist

In February 2003, Leonardo Notarbartolo, was arrested in connection with a break-in to a vault two floors beneath the Antwerp Diamond Center. The thieves were thought to have made off with an estimated $100 million worth of diamonds, gold, jewelry, and other spoils.

Wired News shares the incredible story:

The vault was thought to be impenetrable. It was protected by 10 layers of security, including infrared heat detectors, Doppler radar, a magnetic field, a seismic sensor, and a lock with 100 million possible combinations. The robbery was called the heist of the century, and even now the police can’t explain exactly how it was done.

The loot was never found, but based on circumstantial evidence, Notarbartolo was sentenced to 10 years. He has always denied having anything to do with the crime and has refused to discuss his case with journalists, preferring to remain silent for the past six years.

Until now.

The video is great, but the article delves into the captivating details.

Argentine Mugging Attempt

My brother Gary is down in Argentina this month taking photos and visiting old friends. Today a couple of hooligans, about 15 or 16 years old, tried to rob him. He punched one of them in the face and then made a run for it when they pulled a knife.

Read his story.

Woman Loses Finger in Pit Bull Attack

Kelli’s parents have a friendly Irish Setter named Riley. A couple months ago, while taking a walk with Kelli’s mom, their family pet was attacked by a vicious pit-bull. Despite attempts to separate the attacker from Riley, by hitting the wild dog, she was unable to get him to release his clamped jaws.

Luckily a woman driving by in a van saw the incident and helped to separate the two dogs, finally getting Riley into the safety of her vehicle.

Suddenly a man appeared in a blue sports car, claimed the dog as his brother’s, and apologized for neglecting to keep him in control.
Riley with StichesLong story short, after a vet bill of a few hundred dollars (that Kelli’s folks paid themselves) and some minor cuts to Kelli’s mom’s hand, Riley has healed up and the only lasting damage appeared to be psychological.

Today the Medicine Hat News has reported another attack on the same street by a dog of the same description. This time not only did the dog attack another dog, described as a small Shih Tsu, but in the scuffle the dog bit off a woman’s finger.

See the article after the jump:
Continue reading “Woman Loses Finger in Pit Bull Attack”

The Lost Camera Situation

Using digital technology is a great way to share life’s little adventures. A digital camera, a flickr account, and a blog are pretty much all you need, to show off those great vacation photos from Hawaii.

You don’t even have to actually take your own pictures. That’s sort of what someone named Judith decided she was going to do. She went on a trip to Hawaii and things were going great until she lost her very expensive camera.

However, since Flickr is full of pictures from Hawaii, she decided to create a trip journal with the pictures of strangers who had taken similar photographs. Things weren’t great but she was making the best of a bad situation.

But then something unexpected happened! Things were great again because she was contacted by someone (from Canada I might add) who had found a camera which fit the description perfectly.

But then things were bad again because the people with the camera decided they’d rather not do the right thing after all. (Can I just mention how embarrassing it is that they are from Canada?)

The Internet mob is raging and they want names, email addresses and police action! Judith has decided to refrain from publishing personal information but that doesn’t mean she’s not still trying to get her camera back.

And if that weren’t enough, check out this weird twist over at BoingBoing “some guy claiming to be a “lawer” (sic) is “threatening legal action” against Corry Doctorow for publishing the story. Apparently, the so-called barrister doesn’t know the difference between “libel” and “slander” nor does he apparently consider the part of the libel statute that requires that a plaintiff be referenced in a way that is identifiable to be a factor.

The reporters have started leaving comments on Judith’s blog asking for interviews. I predict that this is a story we’ll be hearing more about, and I hope that the crummy people change their mind and give back the camera. It’s the least they could do after making us Canadians look so bad.

Berkeley Laptop Theft

A Berkeley professor explains the terrifying consequences that will soon befall the student that stole his laptop:

“I have a message for one person in this audience and I’m sorry the rest of you have to sit through this.

As you know my computer was stolen in my last lecture. The thief clearly wanted to betray everyone’s trust; it was after the exam. The thief was smart not to plug the computer into the campus network. But the thief was not smart enough to do three things.

He was not smart enough to immediately remove Windows. I installed the same version of Windows on another computer; within 15 minutes the people in Redmond Washington were very interested to know, why it was that the same version of windows was being signaled to them from two different computers.

The thief also did not inactivate either the wireless card or the transponder that’s in that computer. Within about hour there was a signal from various places on campus which allowed us to track exactly where that computer went and every time that it was turned on.

I’m not particularly concerned about the computer but the thief who thought he was only stealing an exam is presently… we think… probably still in possession of three different kinds of data, any one of which of which can send this man… this young boy actually, to Federal prison. Not a good place for a young boy to be.

You are in possession of data from $100 million trial sponsored by the NIH for which I am a consultant. This involves some of the largest companies on the planet. The NIH investigates these things through the FBI — they have been [..] notified about this problem. You are in possession of trade secrets from a fortune 1000 biotech company — the largest one in the country which I consult for. The Federal Trade [Commission] is very interested in this. The Federal Marshals are the people whom handle that. You are in possession of proprietary data from a pre-public company planning an IPO. The Securities and Exchange Commission is very interested in this and I don’t even know what branch of law enforcement they use. Your academic career is about to come to an end. You are facing very serious charges with the probability of very serious time.

At this point there is very little that anybody can do you for you. The one thing that you can do for yourself is to somehow prove that the integrity of the data which you posses has not been corrupted or copied. Ironically, I am the only person on the planet that can come to your aid because I am the only person that can tell whether the data that was on that computer are still on that computer. You’ll have to find a way, of hoping, that if you copied anything you can prove that you only have one copy of whatever was made.

I am tied up all this afternoon, I am out of town all of next week. You have until 11:55 to return the computer and whatever copies you’ve made to my office because I’m the only hope you’ve got of staying out of deeper trouble than you or any student that I’ve ever known has ever been in.

I apologize to the rest of you for having to bring up this distasteful matter. But I will point out that we have a partial image of this person. We have two eye witnesses to the transponder data. We are going to get this person. Thank you.”

T I Double Geh Errrrrr

Tigger hugging flowers

There is a mother that is suing a Walt Disney World worker accused of groping her 13-year-old daughter while dressed as Tigger.

I asked Anna-Maria what she thought about the possibility it was an accident since she has actually tried on some of the Disney costumes.

She says that, “[While wearing the costume] your vision is greatly, greatly reduced. Furthermore, the suit is not just one layer. You have, generally, an under layer of padding followed up by a fur costume with large mittens on your hands that are often three times your regular hand size.

I tried out many costumes. One was a cat costume, the cat from Pinochio and the sleeves go almost all the way to the ground on them so your hands are covered.

Your feet are the same, you have shoes on followed up with a big fur boot, or depending on the costume a giant rubber shoe or boot.

Also it’s so hot in there you don’t function properly. You’re biggest concern is getting enough oxygen. Definitely not groping someone — although I could be wrong. But I don’t think you could even think about that in that costume. It’s like a pure mental exercise just to stand wearing the costume.

If it was one of the face characters, Santa Claus, Aladdin I could see it. But those other costumes are just unbearable.

I danced for half an hour in one and I was gasping for oxygen. Even when I just tried it on I began to sweat and breath heavily as if I had just run a marathon completely untrained.”

So when I asked her one more time if she thought the accused was truly innocent she replied, “Do you think a fat kid with asthma being chased by a pack of wild dogs could think about that? Because that’s what it’s like being in one of those costumes with parents and kids trying to run you down. You are in survival mode.”

About a second after publishing this post I discovered this AP News Story. It turns out “Tigger” was acquitted earlier today.

The acquittal came less than an hour following a three-day trial during which the defense attorney for Michael Chartrand donned a Tigger costume in an effort to show jurors how difficult it is to maneuver and see in the outfit.

[…]

Chartrand’s defense attorney has contended that the girl’s mother was merely after money and planned to sue Disney. The mother also claimed Tigger touched her breast during the visit to Disney World last February, although no criminal charges followed her allegation.

Kevin Mitnick a Hero?

For those of you that don’t know, Kevin Mitnick is the famous hacker that was all over the news way back when for being a hacker. They also based the movie Hackers on his story.

Via Plastic QL:

Kevin Mitnick has been labelled a hero in the small town of River Rouge, Michigan where he helped capture a 15-year old student who was phoning in bomb threats into the local high school. How did he do it? “I gave them the same techniques that [Tsutomu] Shimomura used to track me.”

Here’s a version of the story in by Kevin Poulsen in The Register.

Vandal Captured

Have you ever been splashed by a car while riding your bike or walking out in rainy weather? I hope you didn’t do what this guy did, slashing some 2000 tires and doing £250,000 as pay-back. He’ll be cooling his heels in jail for the next 16 months.

From the BBC:

Recorder Stephen Lennard said: “In December last year, motivated by frustration and anger at what you considered to be the inconsiderate manner of motorists as experienced by you as a cyclist and a pedestrian, you embarked on your astonishing and extraordinary campaign.

“The scale of the damage and the financial consequences of it are breathtaking.”

They’re Calling It, "The Mother of All Canadian Political Scandals"

Yesterday’s Auditor Generals report revealed a situation in Ottawa so serious and shocking as to be without precedence in our country’s history. All other previous scandals (yes, we’ve had lots of them) pale by comparison.

http://www.thestar.ca/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1076411365455&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154

Feb. 10, 2004. 08:41 PM

‘Shocking‘ misuse of public funds
Martin launches public inquiry

CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA (CP) – The quarter-billion-dollar federal sponsorship fiasco was so widespread that even Canada‘s fabled national police force was used to funnel cash to friends of the federal government, Auditor General Sheila Fraser said today.

Fraser delivered a brutally methodical account of how the Public Works Department used Crown corporations and the RCMP to systematically shovel funds from a national-unity program to a select group of businesses.

The indictment claimed its first casualty before it was even made public. Former public works minister Alfonso Gagliano was summarily fired from his job as ambassador to Denmark by Prime Minister Paul Martin.

Gagliano‘s department ran a now-infamous sponsorship and advertising program that saw organizers of Quebec public events paid huge sums to display Canadian flags or federal logos from 1997 to 2003.

But more than $100 million – or 40 per cent of the $250 million fund – ended up in the pockets of middlemen who sometimes did nothing more than just turn over cheques, Fraser charged.

The list of mysterious transactions, enigmatic banking and blatant fraud was detailed in detached but devastating prose in her report.

Crown corporations like VIA Rail, Canada Post, and the Port of Montreal were also fingered in a report that has potentially explosive consequences ahead of an expected spring election.

“This is just such a blatant misuse of public funds. It is shocking. . . . Words escape me,” Fraser told a news conference.

“This wasn‘t just a matter of missing documentation or bending the rules. These methods were apparently designed to pay commissions to communications agencies while hiding the source of the funds.”

Each glance at her own report stirred her to outrage, Fraser said. She called for an independent inquiry into the affair.

The government immediately agreed to hold an investigation.

Justice John Gomery of the Quebec Superior Court will lead the public inquiry. Another jurist, Andre Gauthier, was named special counsel for financial recovery. Gauthier‘s job will be to launch civil suits to recover some of the squandered money.

The government has had several months to prepare its response to what turns out to be a ticking political time bomb tossed into Martin‘s lap by his predecessor, Jean Chrétien.

Fraser‘s report was supposed to be made public last November, but Chrétien prorogued Parliament which delayed the auditor general‘s indictment until he was out of office.

But Martin‘s field generals and his entire cabinet have been seized by the need to dull the sting of a blow that could ground the prime minister‘s lofty public approval ratings.

Several senior members of the government were at a meeting at 8 a.m. today. Aides could be seen lugging bulky briefing material into the Langevin building housing the prime minister‘s office.

One senior government official promised to follow the investigation wherever it might lead – even if it hurts the Liberal party.

“We‘re not interested in a witch hunt and we‘re not interested in anything that could negatively affect the party brand,” said the official.

“But at the end of the day the public interest demands that the answers to these questions be provided.

“We‘re the government. We‘re not just a political party.”

Martin immediately called the report‘s findings “intolerable” and announcing several steps to contain the damage.

“Canadians deserve better and we will deal with the findings of the auditor general‘s report in all of its facets and we will do so immediately and we will do so thoroughly,” Martin said.

He said the government will take four steps:

  1. An independent public inquiry to probe the scandal.
  2. An immediate review of the auditor‘s report by the House of Commons public accounts committee.
  3. Appoint a special counsel to recover public funds which were inappropriately attained.
  4. Introduce other measures to ensure the problems never occur again, including whistleblower protection and better management practices.

Opposition critics swiftly pounced at the scent of government blood. Their primary question: Why didn‘t Martin take action when he was finance minister in Chrétien‘s cabinet alongside Gagliano?

“Why did the prime minister stay silent when long ago he could have just said, `Stop it, this isn‘t right,” Grant Hill, the interim Conservative leader, asked in the Commons.

“The prime minister knew about the scandal and yet he said nothing and he did nothing. Why did he choose to be silent instead of speaking up?”

Martin responded that he was unaware of any wrongdoing and approved funding for the sponsorship program on the assumption that rules were being followed.

But several opposition critics predicted that closer examination of the money trail will further embarrass the prime minister and damage the reputation of the governing party.

“This was not a government operation,” NDP MP Bill Blaikie said of the sponsorship program. “This was a Liberal party operation.”

When allegations of mismanagement first surfaced two years ago, the RCMP was called in to launch a criminal investigation that has since resulted in charges against Montreal businessman Paul Coffin.

Calling in the Mounties to investigate this time will be impossible, said Conservative MP John Williams.

“They (the RCMP) have to explain why they have become involved in a money-laundering scheme. This is our national police force,” he said.

“This is a scandal of the greatest magnitude.”

The RCMP‘s 125th anniversary in 1999 turned into an embarrassing waste of taxpayer dollars, Fraser said.

Public Works contributed $3 million to a trio of ad agencies – Lafleur, Media/I.D.A. Vision and Gosselin – who were responsible for transferring the money to the RCMP.

Those three agencies took a combined $1.3 million in fees and commissions and transferred $1.7 million to the RCMP for its anniversary celebration.

Fraser‘s audit concluded that the RCMP‘s Quebec division received its payments through a separate non-government bank account, which violates the federal Financial Administration Act.

The transactions were recorded manually rather than in the RCMP‘s standard accounting system, and some of the supporting documents were subsequently destroyed.

Fraser outlined similar practices in a stamp competition organized by Canada Post; in a Via Rail-sponsored television series on hockey legend Maurice Richard; and in a project to raise $1.5 million for a giant screen TV for the federally run Port of Montreal.

The auditor general expressed two major concerns with the practice.

First, there was obviously no need to go through private middlemen to transfer cheques from a government department to a government agency or crown corporation.

And it was useless to pay federal agencies like the RCMP to display the federal logo at their events. Treasury Board guidelines required them to do it, with or without the sponsorship program, Fraser noted.

The Chrétien government created the now-infamous program as a response to the near-catastrophe of the 1995 Quebec referendum.

Federal funds were used to fund sports and cultural events – almost always in Quebec – while event organizers plastered Canadian flags and federal posters for visitors to see.

But the government used the fund to confer lavish commissions on a small group of ad agencies that acted as middlemen.

Fraser had already denounced the practice in a narrower 2002 probe that focused on $1.6 million transferred to Groupaction Marketing Inc.

She concluded at the time that the federal government broke “just about every rule in the book” in awarding contracts to the Montreal agency.

Groupaction said today it has voluntarily collaborated during each step of the audit.

But the Quebec company said it has been a victim of the situation, which caused the loss of about 100 jobs.

“It‘s important to underline that all of the work received by Groupaction were for contracts duly issued,” the company said in a news release. “That said, the absence, not to mention the apparent disappearance, of government documents has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to Groupaction.”

Fraser‘s report released today also blasted the government in other areas. Fraser also concluded that:

The Chrétien government ignored federal contracting policies in rushing to spend $101 million on two Bombardier jets for the prime minister and other VIPs.

Indian and Northern Affairs has failed to track spending or resolve disputes linked to native land claims worth more than $1.2 billion.

Her probe into the sponsorship fiasco highlighted a number of other irregularities.

Among them was the story of a communications firm that received a $600 commission from a $5,600 grant to a Quebec college.

All the government received in return was the MP‘s name added to a mural at the college.

She also explained how the Montreal Impact soccer team received almost $150,000 in sponsorship funds during the 1998-99 indoor season.

A similar request by the Edmonton Drillers soccer team was rejected, with the government claiming no funds were available.